Natural Law as discussed by Mark Passio

Let us discuss Natural Law by Mark Passio

It took me a couple of weeks to get through the lecture called 'Streetwise Spirituality' but I finally got through it, all six plus hours of it and the only thing that dragged it out so long before I could complete it was my own reticence in spending the time watching it. I am a cyclical person and lately the cycle I have been locked in is one of pessimism regarding my studies. In the last month I have spent an inordinate amount of time playing an open world video game. It has been my distraction as I bide my time. Why I am telling you all this, I really do not know, especially as it is my intention to discuss my impressions on Natural Law as discussed by Mark Passio in the lecture titled 'Streetwise Spirituality'. Perhaps by highlighting this aspect of my cyclical self, it will assist me in breaking the rote repetitiveness of this cycle.

The one thing that Impressed me most about his lecture is that every subject he touched on wasi/is a subject that I too have delved into in a similar manner, though, in most cases, certainly not to the same intensive degree as he does. This was a reassurance to me that I am not completely mad as some people do think of me as being for some of the far out ideas that i have discussed.

There are some things that I do not speak about too often, especially not to the degree he does, for example the magic of words, and the matrix of magic spells designed to enslave your mind via the English language, which is a contrived language of which a thousand words have been attributed to William Shakespeare alone, who it is alleged, was in truth one Sir Francis Bacon, known to his Masonic comrades as Speareshaker, a 33rd level member of the Freemasons. This is, in my opinion, an obvious; that the best way to control the minds of a population is to control the language that they use. How does one convey a concept if they do not have the language or even just a word that can be used to convey such a concept? A great example of this is; what if you met an extraterrestrial life form that was 99.9% energy and having no physical form they had no need for structures called homes or the possession of matter and now you find that you have been charged with negotiating a treaty with them and you have to impart on them how these things are important to humans. How do you do it?

There is so much that we take for granted with our language. Most of us are very very clueless to what it is we are actually saying and repeating ad nauseum to ourselves, making our minds sick with delusional false beliefs. How many times have you prefaced a statement by saying; 'I don't think.....'? Is it just a cute colloquialism of our language, or is it a poisonous self-defeating mind fuck meant to trick you into a non-thinking passive state? It is mathematically a false statement. Rather than saying, 'I don't think you are right.' It is better to say, 'I think that you are wrong'~ OR ~ 'I don't think you understand'. to, 'I think you misunderstand'. Odds are if you use such language with me, I will dismiss your thought as a non-thought, or worse, let my ego run amok and have fun with you at your expense.

Language is incredibly important, it defines who and what we are as individuals and as groups. Before anything can manifest in this plane of existence, especially at the hands of humans, it requires a thought to preface it, for all human accomplishments began first and foremost as a thought. What if there were not the language to conceive a thing as a thought. Could it still be manifested into creation by humans? I think not.

At one point Mark Passio delved into the violence of taxation and I feared that this was going to be the point where he slips into a politicalism that I have seen primarily come out of the U.S. called Libertarianism, to which, I was presently surprised that he did not. But it does raise a point about how a society governs itself. While there is no doubt that taxation as it is today is nothing more that an aspect of economic slavery, how does a society structure itself to be able to provide for humanity in a fair and equitable manner. It is one thing to have a society of hunter gatherers who live directly off the land, it is another thing altogether with the population that we have today. I do not equate this with overpopulation as some might. To me the problem is how do you structure society to function in a healthy harmonious manner with natural law? Does the concept of money fit into natural law? My inclination is to suggest that it does not. That it is just another means of attaining power over others. That money is a tool of the rulers, the accumulation of such creates power and power is generally a pre-requisite to ruling. Is a moneyless society possible? If not, can a society govern itself without some form of taxation?

When it comes down to it, just about anything is possible for a society, the real question is, is it preferable? True Anarchy does require a moneyless society, but such a society cannot be implemented from the top down, it must come from the people as a grass roots movement. A top down implementation can only be achieved through violence, where-as a grass roots evolution can grow and evolve peacefully, if allowed to. The unfortunate sad truth is, that regardless of what our intents are, regardless of how we try to shape the revolution, the odds are it will be conscripted by the powers that be and sold back to us only it has been infected by the zeitgeist of the rulers~ this is how they stay in power.

Sooo, what sayeth thou?